The failure to act with reasonable and appropriate professional care is a common topic in court cases in New South Wales. This is known as professional negligence and it occurs across a variety of settings, from the professional to the everyday and commonplace. Unsurprising, professional negligence claims are frequently encountered in areas such as accounting, financial planning and also the medical field in terms of doctors failing to care for their patients adequately.
Negligence occurs when a person suffers loss because of the failure of reasonable care of another. This person may then sue for to acquire compensation for the harm they experienced as a result.
With the above definitions, the person who has experienced harm is the applicant and the party allegedly responsible for the harm is the respondent.
When pursuing a claim of negligence, the applicant is responsible for at least some of the following:
To further explore the above elements, let’s extend the definitions to understand the roles that can be involved in different negligence cases.
A duty of care can be applied in many settings. In New South Wales, the court is responsible for ruling if a duty of care is owed in each specific case. Put simply, it is an obligation that arises in the given circumstances.
For example, a doctor is expected to treat a patient with reasonable care. Other duties of care relationships in professional settings include:
Aside from these authoritative relationships in professional settings, you can also see negligence occur in everyday occurrences. For example, an IT provider may install security software negligently causing phishing or a data breach.
To accurately assess if a person or entity has acted outside of their duty of care, this standard must first be defined. Once established, it is then appropriate to decide if the standard was not met. All persons who owe a duty of care hold a responsibility to avoid causing foreseeable harm, like a teacher keeping his students safe.
In the above example, a teacher holds a responsibility to maintain the safety of students by protecting them from foreseeable harm and implementing precautions when necessary. Teachers must exercise reasonable care to the children, in a way that a parent would also act.
It mostly boils down to common sense, but things can also get more complicated like in cases of contributory negligence or vicarious liabilities.
Where a person claims to have suffered damage, the court must decide if this injury was in fact caused by the claimed negligence. Ultimately – this is the main factor in negligent cases. The Civil Liability Legislation is used to consider if negligence occurred and what the respondent then owes by way of compensation if found to be negligent.
Both historical and current copies of The Civil Liability Act, and other subordinate legislation, can be found on government websites although it may be best to ask a lawyer to assist with their interpretation and application.
An injury does not necessarily mean physical harm. It can also include the following:
These matters are decided by the court and on the basis of evidence admitted. Each step in the process is important to consider as they can affect the outcome of any verdict.
In the event of medical negligence, a clinician fails to treat a patient per the widely-accepted medical standard of care. This can include misdiagnosis, improper treatment, surgical errors, and overall inappropriate care.
The relationship of the building owner to the tenant may mean that the owner is responsible for providing a safe structure to live in. Failing to build and apply building to standards, such as maintaining heat and electricity, can perhaps be deemed to be negligence although much depends on the circumstances and if there is a lease agreement the terms of it.
An engineer may be responsible for designing a structure to deal with particular loads, and if it fails to do so then that may point to professional negligence. Again, much depends on the facts.
To the applicant that wins their negligence case, they are awarded compensation that is measured in terms of returning the person to their pre-injury status. Examples of this could include the following:
When considering pursuing a case of professional negligence, it’s highly advised that a person seeks counsel from a lawyer (and not a layperson like an author) to provide the necessary guidance. A New South Wales lawyer can greatly aid in the organization of information, the definition of roles, and overall negligence inquiry.
Federal Register of Legislation
https://www.legislation.gov.au/Details/C2016Q00058/Html/Text#_Toc197935191
Legal Services Commission
https://lawhandbook.sa.gov.au/ch01s05.php
Government of South Australia Legislation.
https://www.legislation.sa.gov.au/LZ/C/A/CIVIL%20LIABILITY%20ACT%201936.aspx
Australian Journal of Teacher Education
https://ro.ecu.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1289&context=ajte
Electric mountain bikes (EMTBs) are opening up the world of off-road riding to more people…
Maintaining wellness is a lifelong journey, and the strategies that help you feel your best…
The buildings we live and work in influence far more than we often realize. From…
Long study hours, endless vocabulary lists, and the constant pressure to score well often turn…
Once you adapt to working out, you may wonder if you are training hard enough…
The change from chaos to recovery after a fire damages a home or place of…
This website uses cookies.